Trial court did not err in denying appellant’s motion to withdraw her guilty pleas after finding there was no manifest injusticeġ128202 Theresa Weaver Young v. No error in Commission’s finding that as appellant suffered a pre-existing functional loss of use of her lower right extremity, appellees were entitled to a credit and the Commission did not err in awarding appellant permanent partial disability based on the 25% rating attributable to the workplace injuryĠ889204 Ghyslaine Mendez Belmonte, s/k/a Ghyslaine Mendez-Belmonte v. Augusta Health and Safety First Insurance Co. Trial court did not err in determining it had jurisdiction to consider this adoption petition as this case was not a parental placement adoption and neither parent consented to the adoption so the juvenile court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to address whether the parent’s consent was being withheld contrary to the best interests of the childĠ109213 Amanda Clements v. Trial court erred in finding appellee’s constitutional rights to a speedy trial were violatedĠ062213 Samantha Colleen Coward v. Trial court did not err in terminating appellant’s parental rights to her child and approving the foster care goal of adoptionĠ197212 Commonwealth of Virginia v. City of Virginia Beach Department of Human Services Summary affirmance – trial court did not err in changing the foster care goal and finding that a goal of adoption was in the child’s best interestsĠ113211 Carole Anne Filyaw v. Bristol Virginia Department of Social Services No error in trial court’s award of spousal support to appellee where desertion is not a bar to spousal support and appellee did not desert appellant when she sought a protective orderĠ057213 Mary Ann Cooper v. Summary affirmance – trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion for a continuance or err in finding the child was abused or neglected and that the evidence was sufficient to remove the child from the homeġ345202 Mark Wayne Walter, A/K/A Tiger David Darling v. City of Hampton Department of Social Services
No error in trial court’s finding that appellant did not have the victim’s permission to use the credit cards and that the payments made to appellant were not legitimate wages or loansġ255201 Lorin Cotton v. Summary affirmance – trial court did not err in terminating appellant’s parental rights to his children and approving the foster care goal of adoptionġ075203 Brandi Starr Floyd v. Culpeper County Department of Social Services Summary affirmance – Court finds appellant’s arguments waived for his failure to comply with Rules 5A:20 and 5A:25Ġ301214 Michael Allen Clark, Sr. Summary affirmance – trial court did not err in finding the paternal grandmother was not a viable placement option or in terminating appellant’s parental rights to his child and approving the foster care goal of adoptionġ338202 Ananda K. Bedford County Department of Social Services Summary affirmance – no error in Commission’s finding that appellee sustained a compensable neck injury in her workplace accidentĠ359213 John Franklin Higgins v.
DEADLY INNOCENCE SCOTT BURNSIDE PDF MERGE CODE
Summary affirmance – No error in Commission’s award of total disability benefits to appellee where the evidence was sufficient to prove appellee was permanently and totally disabled under Code § 65.2-504(A)(4)Ġ354212 Richmond Public Schools, et al. Larry Kerr Ĭommission did not err in finding appellee’s injuries arose out of his employment and in affirming the award of temporary total disability benefits to appelleeĠ328213 Dickenson-Russell Coal Company, LLC and Brickstreet Mutual Ins. Summary affirmance – trial court did not err in terminating appellant’s parental rights to his child under Code § 16.1-283(C)(2) after finding appellant had been unable to remedy the conditions leading to the child’s placement in foster careĠ173212 Magic City Ford Lincoln Isuzu Trucks and Vada Group Self-Insurance Association v.
Summary affirmance – no error in trial court’s finding that the evidence was sufficient to terminate appellant’s parental rights to her children and that the termination was in their best interestsĠ494211 Matthew Harris v. Judgment of trial court terminating appellant’s parental rights to her children pursuant to Code § 16.1-283(C)(2) affirmedĠ268214 Ebony Lashay Smith a/k/a Ebony Manns-Smith City of Newport News Department of Human Services The Adobe Acrobat Viewer (free from Adobe) allows you to view and print PDF documents.Ġ093211 Tammy Anne Reinbold v.
These opinions are available as Adobe Acrobat PDF documents. Home > Virginia's Court System > Court of Appeals of Virginia > Court of Appeals of Virginia Unpublished OpinionsĬourt of Appeals of Virginia Unpublished Opinions